<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transparency in Presidential Signing Statements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/08/10/transparency-in-presidential-signing-statements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/08/10/transparency-in-presidential-signing-statements/</link>
	<description>Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WhiteRoof Compliant</title>
		<link>http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/08/10/transparency-in-presidential-signing-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-103139</link>
		<dc:creator>WhiteRoof Compliant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/?p=10379#comment-103139</guid>
		<description>One more example of how it&#039;s just the same old &quot;Machine,&quot; with only a different face, and purported idealogy.

It would seem that &quot;Presidential Signing Statements&quot; should be unconstitutional in and of themselves, and one wonders why they have not been presented to the Supreme Court as same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more example of how it&#8217;s just the same old &#8220;Machine,&#8221; with only a different face, and purported idealogy.</p>
<p>It would seem that &#8220;Presidential Signing Statements&#8221; should be unconstitutional in and of themselves, and one wonders why they have not been presented to the Supreme Court as same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Brett Spencer</title>
		<link>http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/08/10/transparency-in-presidential-signing-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-102834</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Brett Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/?p=10379#comment-102834</guid>
		<description>One can only hope that the president does not become dicouraged with the proper protocol of legislative business. Just another act of novicity by governmental officials. One would hope his advisors could help befpre he gets that far the next time. Besidesthat is what they are paid for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can only hope that the president does not become dicouraged with the proper protocol of legislative business. Just another act of novicity by governmental officials. One would hope his advisors could help befpre he gets that far the next time. Besidesthat is what they are paid for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
