Making Government Transparent and Accountable
The Sunlight Foundation uses cutting-edge technology and ideas to make government transparent and accountable. Underlying all of our efforts is a fundamental belief that increased transparency will improve the public's confidence in government
The Sunlight Foundation Blog
-
Let the Sun Shine In
This Sunshine Week was a particularly successful (and busy!) time for Sunlight. We helped usher in new transparency legislation, launched a nation-wide grassroots campaign, launched a new design contest, joint led a crowdsourced search for government data, met with editorial boards and more. No wonder we’re all exhausted this Friday afternoon.
Here’s a more granular look at what we accomplished this week:
For Sunlight’s Communications team, Sunshine Week began early, with extensive outreach to editorial boards, reporters and columnists. This strategy paid off, as Sunday’s kick off of Sunshine Week by newspapers across the country included many mentions of Sunlight’s work. (You can read all of our mentions on our site — and note we’re still updating the list.)
On Monday, John Wonderlich, Gabriela Schneider and I met with an editorial writer Washington Post to discuss initiatives we support that would further improve public access to government information including the Public Online Information Act.
That bill was introduced at a press conference on Tuesday (under a transparently clear sky) on Capitol Hill. I joined Rep. Steve Israel and the Personal Democracy Forum’s Andrew Rasiej (who is also an adviser to Sunlight) in announcing this landmark legislation. You can watch our press conference if you want to know more details about this groundbreaking legislation.
On Wednesday, Sunlight Labs launched our fourth official contest: Design for America. Part contest, part festival, the Design for America contest’s intent is to inspire the design community to tell great stories about how our government works, what our government does, and what it could do. It’s a contest as much about possibility as transparency, and with categories ranging from infographics to web design, there’s plenty for all to compete.
Also on Wednesday, we joined the Center for Public Integrity in crowdsourcing our Data Mine project, a new online series identifying inaccessible or difficult to use information from the federal government. We need your tips on what federal government records, databases, and filings should be open to the public – join us to help so you can continue to read about public government data that we still can’t access. Follow Jim Morris’ posts on the Reporting Group site, like his most recent report.
On Thursday, Sunlight’s Engagement team kicked off our new Public=Online campaign . Jake Brewer led a roundtable discussion at Google’s D.C. headquarters, with Jose Antonio Vargas from Huffington Post; Jim Harper from Cato Institute and WashingtonWatch.com; Ginny Hunt from Google’s Public Sector Lab and Ryan Hopkins of Public Square Project in Pittsburgh. Public=Online is a completely non-partisan campaign with the first goal of making government transparency a major issue in the upcoming mid-term elections. We hope you’ll sign the pledge and join us.
I traveled to Boston that day to meet with the Boston Globe editorial board, speak with fellows at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School, and at an MIT’s Center for Future Civic Media Forum.
Our Engagement team also organized a Sunshine Week Blogswarm, in which about 50 bloggers across the country pledged they would blog about the importance of transparency to them. Look for a “Local Sunlight” blog post early next week by Nisha Thompson with a roundup.
Today, John Wonderlich joined White House Special Counsel to the President for Ethics and Government Reform, Norm Eisen, and Jim Harper from Cato and WashingtonWatch.com (which I should note is a Sunlight grantee) at the OpenTheGovernment.org “Building Transparency” panel at the Center for American Progress.
Whew! What a week.
-
Public=Online Launch Event @ Google
“I can’t think of a more important word in politics than transparency.”
Those words were spoken by Huffington Post’s Technology & Innovations Editor Jose Antonio Vargas at yesterday’s launch of Sunlight’s Public=Online national transparency campaign. Vargas couldn’t have a found a more receptive crowd for that statement as the room was filled with a cross-partisan selection of people ready to geek-out about transparency.
As one audience member noted, Vargas’ statement couldn’t be more true. House leaders are pledging to provide copies of the health care bill at every iteration online for the public to view 72 hours before coming to the floor. The normal parochial deals cut behind-the-scenes to help secure legislative success are becoming albatrosses for those lawmakers who pursued them. And transparency promises are being publicly challenged and praised as they are raised to a high level of policy importance. Transparency isn’t just a buzzword, it’s the word.
-
Ranking Occupations by Ideology
This is a really clever infographic by Adam Bonica showing the ideological placement of occupations through an examination of their campaign contributions:
This covers only the 2008 election cycle and shows that, by and large, most occupations fall into the Democratic category aside from the obviously traditionally conservative oil and gas and auto dealer industries. What I would love to see here is what this graphic would look like over time. How would this look in the 2006 cycle or, better yet, the 2002 cycle? I’m pretty sure that you would find major fluctuations in the ideological placement of these industries depending on which party is in charge of Congress. Even more so, the size of the party’s majority would matter too.
-
Idea to Action: Launching the Public=Online Campaign
Well, friends, it’s time to start turning our talk into something with impact.At 2 p.m. today, we are launching the Public=Online campaign to put public pressure on government to be more open and transparent. This is our new website where all the information about the campaign will be:
It’s a completely non-partisan campaign with the first goal of making government transparency a major issue in the upcoming mid-term elections.
Ultimately, Public=Online is focused on getting government to pass the transparency laws we need – laws that put government information online in real-time where we can use it – and we’re going to do that by building a demand for transparency that is so large it cannot be ignored by politicians.
We are going to ensure public officials answer to us for making government open and transparent by telling them just how important it is to us as we consider who to vote for in November.
This will only work, though, if hundreds of thousands of people make this bold statement across the country – in every city, state and congressional district.
What we need first and foremost is for as many people as possible to make this statement with us by signing the Public=Online pledge, and asking others to join as well.
It is through the pledge – and the number of people that sign it – that this campaign will build political clout strong enough to move government. When it comes to making government transparent, we need that clout to be as big as possible.
In the months ahead, we will send letters to the editor and make calls to congress; we’ll organize days of action around such legislation as the Public Online Information Act, and we’ll ensure that our representatives Read the Bill.
We’ll ask candidates for office questions about their positions on transparency at town halls, we’ll scour earmark requests, write blog posts diving into campaign data or post video of important events.
There are a thousand things we can do together – many of which we don’t even know yet – but first, we must come together with a powerful voice, and that’s what this pledge does.
For the first few weeks, that is our focus. And if we have anything to say about it, it will also be a lot of fun.
This is just the beginning.
If you’re on Twitter or Facebook, this is the message we’re asking people to put in their status:
Help me get government information online in real-time. We CAN make government more transparent. http://publicequalsonline.com #opengov
If you can be more creative than that… we’re excited to see what you come up with!
-
Supreme Court unveils new website: how does it look?
-
- New website
Last year, we made suggestions about how the U.S. Supreme Court should redesign its website. Today, the Court unveiled a new website. The new website is a small but important step towards increased openness and accessibility, although it needs serious work.
Notable improvements include making recent Court decisions available from the homepage, a somewhat more logical design, and an interactive Court calendar that allows you to see what cases are scheduled for argument. According to the Court, additional enhancements include docket files going back to 2000, a new case citation finder, and enhanced search and navigation abilities.
-
- Sunlight’s mock-up
There are several areas where important improvements should be made, all of which focus around providing context to the information it provides.
- The webpage needs to provide more information about what the Court is doing, explaining legal terms of art, and grouping relevant information together (such as information pertaining to a particular case).
- It should incorporate a user-friendly advanced search engine.
- Use machine-readable formats (not just PDFs).
-
- Old Site
We strongly encourage those redesigning the Supreme Court’s website to talk to members of the user community to get a better feel for the kinds of improvements that would be helpful. Certainly, we would be willing to engage in that conversation.
Additional Resources:
- Blog of the Legal Times (3/18/2010): Supreme Court Unveils New Web Site Design
- SCOTUSBlog (3/18/2010): Changes for Court’s website
- SCOTUSBlog (10/1/2009): A proposed redesign for the Supreme Court
- Sunlight Foundation (8/27/2009): The Supreme Court Website: An Updated Redesign
- Sunlight Foundation (6/2/2009): Redesigning The Government: The U.S. Supreme Court
- A compendium of resources from Sunlight (wiki page)
-
-
Where’s CONAN? 6 months later, still no sign of legal treatise
On the 220th birthday of the Constitution, Sunlight made a simple request: the fantastic legal treatise known as the Constitution Annotated should be published online in XML. The Constitution Annotated — CONAN, to those who know it well — explains the U.S. Constitution section-by-section in light of Supreme Court decisions. Federal law requires that the Library of Congress write this document, a task that has fallen on the Congressional Research Service; the Government Printing Office is required by law to publish it.
The other Conan.
Today, 6 months after our letter to CRS and GPO, which asks them to publish the XML file online, and regularly update it online (just like on Congress’ internal website, which is up-to-date), the public still does not have access to CONAN in XML. The American people deserve access to an authoritative explanation of the Constitution, especially when it is prepared by public servants and is required by law to be publicly available.
Senator Feingold, the Chairman of the Constitution subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee, agrees with us. He wrote a letter to GPO and CRS in November asking for “the Constitution Annotated to the published online in XML format … with updates be made available to the general public at the same time they are made available to Congress.”
And yet here we are, six months later, on the Constitution’s half birthday. Has anything changed? As always, GPO continues to publish limited updates to CONAN every other year, in plain text file and PDF formats, and updates the full treatise once a decade. That’s not enough.
CONAN is updated as the Supreme Court issues decisions — and yet, we’re still stuck in 2008. A lot has changed since then, including a new Supreme Court justice and several landmark decisions. CRS generates the file in XML, but that detailed meta-data is stripped out. GPO recently (and admirably) started publishing the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations in XML. (This video explains why XML is useful.) So why not this?
In July 2009, the Public Printer, the head of GPO, gave a speech recognizing the importance of the federal government “provid[ing] complete legal and regulatory information online in an electronic format that is fully visible by the American people free of charge. We should start with the Constitution Annotated.” So how do things stand now?
When we asked CRS for a comment on the status of CONAN last week, their spokesperson, Janine D’Addario, had a three-word comment: “discussions are continuing.” This adds to their comment from last September: “The Congressional Research Service and the Government Printing Office plan to discuss publication of the Constitution Annotated and possible future enhancements.”
GPO was more forthcoming. Their spokesperson, Gary Somerset, said, “GPO serves the needs of our customers and is committed to providing the American public access to federal government information in an electronic format this is usable and free of charge. In all facets of GPO’s information dissemination, the agency acts as the ‘printer’ under the direction of the publishing agency. In the case of CONAN, that is the U.S. Senate. GPO is currently awaiting direction from the Senate on this issue.”
Over the last several years, Congress and the President have made government transparency a priority. They have urged agencies to conceive of their missions in ways that maximize transparency. Allowing for the re-use of government-held information — which is owned by the public — is fundamental to transparency. It should not take an Act of Congress (specifically, of the Senate) demanding that CRS and GPO fully open CONAN to the American people to get these agencies to do what is already within their power.
We have heard some rumblings of progress, like thunder in the distance. We hope this rumbling will grow into a roar. Publishing CONAN online, in XML, as it is updated, would be an easy win for CRS, GPO, and the American people.
* As usual, I have to disclose that I served as a legislative attorney with CRS. More information about the Constitution Annotated is available here.
-
Video: Press Conference Announcing the Public Online Information Act
Representative Steve Israel, Sunlight Executive Director Ellen Miller, and Personal Democracy Forum co-founder Andrew Rasiej announce the introduction of the Public Online Information Act, or POIA, in the House of Representatives. More information is available at ThePOIA.org. Watch the video below.
-
Who Am I? What Am I Doing Here? (Everything I Learned Came From Romero Movies)
In honor of Sunlight Week I’ve posted an explanation on what I do and why I do it below. A little personal transparency from the Sunlight Foundation:
I’ve always loved zombie movies, although I’m almost exclusively particular to those made by George Romero. The slow-moving zombie representing the real imminence of death in all of our lives is a resonating image, whether you get the metaphor or not. One morning in 1999, I was awoken by a scene out of a Romero movie. The front and backyards of my parent’s Takoma, D.C. house were filled with members of the press moaning and creeping ever closer to the doors. For months, I had been greeted every morning and followed home every afternoon by these ravenous creatures who sought to devour the brains of every man, woman and child in America. They would appear on the television in the form of talking heads or politicians as I ate dinner and would call, incessantly, at all hours of the day (“Braaaaiiins,” they would mumble). Zombieland isn’t a movie, it’s the culture spawned by the political elites and the media that covers them. Looking back at that moment, while we waited for the police to arrive to clear the undead from our lawn, I can’t help but think that that brain-dead media swarm was ripe for a Romero metaphor–which I’m sure you can figure out on your own. I couldn’t exactly pick up a sawed-off shotgun to kill these rotting corpses, but there turned out to be other ways of helping out.
Wanting to reorient Washington away from it’s zombified state–and the desperate need for a job–led me to the Sunlight Foundation. In 2006, I was brought onto this crazy ride by Sunlight’s Executive Director Ellen Miller. Over the last four years I’ve cut out a role doing two important things to try and keep the zombies off of our lawns in the days ahead: (1) advocate for more information and data be released to the public and (2) use that information and data to report on and “data-jam” politicians and the media. I’ll try to explain both of these things and why they matter below (be forewarned, inexplicable references to the 18th century may occur).
Let’s start with number (1): Advocating for transparency
The truth of the matter is that the proper way to dispose of the carrion in Washington isn’t to necessarily send new bodies in, but to expand the voice of those coming from without. And this isn’t solely about amplification. Higher decibel levels seem to feed the zombie virus. What is important is creating better informed voices, not louder ones. Doing that requires connecting people who want information about their government to the information they seek. The best way to change Washington is to open it up to the people. This doesn’t mean a direct democracy, but an informed democratic polity where people have the same access to information as their representatives. What I’m talking about, and why I work here, is to promote and create egalitarian access to information. (Continue reading…)
-
Transparency Around the World
(Note: this post has been updated since it was first published—see below)
It’s Sunshine Week again, and in that spirit I want to share a recent story about open government. Two weeks ago, a government professional from the Republic of Korea looked over at me and, through an interpreter, said he was going to tell me why their political system is better than America’s.
It was an interesting moment for me. At the meeting were three additional South Korean professionals, and I listened attentively as their interpreter related the gist of the argument:
- Corporations in South Korea are prohibited from spending money on political activity.
- Individuals can spend up to $5,000 per year on National Assembly races, and they can only give to four candidates per year.
- Any spending above $3,000 must be disclosed.
How did I find myself in this situation? For starters, it wasn’t the first time! One of the many pleasant aspects about working at the Sunlight Foundation is the simple act of talking about open government with other interested parties. In this case, it was a delegation of professionals from Korea. The trip was arranged by World Learning, as part of the International Visitor Leadership Program administered by the U.S. State Department. Yesterday’s was the fifth such meeting I’ve participated in since I started at Sunlight—previously, my colleagues and I discussed transparency with a delegation of Dutch officials, an activist/videographer from Australia, a political science professor from Colombia, and officials from Latin America.
I was a little playful in that last paragraph, but the meetings are more than just “pleasant.” (Continue reading…)
